Applying a Strength-Based Intervetion for Dyads with Mild to Moderate Memory Loss Two Case Examples Managing and coping with the symptoms of dementia and memory loss is associated with negative psychosocial outcomes for both persons with dementia and their family caregivers. Research has indicated beneficial results in using dementia-management interventions to impact positively on mental health outcomes for caregivers and address cognitive and functional issues for persons with dementia. However, most intervention programmes to date have primarily worked with each care partner separately, rather than implementing a single intervention protocol that targets both members of the caregiving dyad. This article provides a description of a newly designed intervention that includes both care partners. Using a Strength-Based Approach, the dyadic intervention identifies and builds upon both care partners’ current abilities to address their specific care needs. Two case examples are presented to illustrate the flexibility and advantages of using a Strength-Based Approach. The discussion highlights the extent to which core intervention skills can be tailored to fit a range of care needs. Read more
Acceptability and Feasibility Results of a Strength-Based Skills Training Program for Dementia Caregiving Dyads Purpose: The current article provides an in-depth description of a dyadic intervention for individuals with dementia and their family caregivers. Using a strength-based approach, caregiving dyads received skills training across 5 key areas: (a) education regarding dementia and memory loss, (b) effective communication, (c) managing memory loss, (d) staying active, and (e) recognizing emotions and behaviors. Results of the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention protocols are also presented. Design and Methods: Caregiving dyads were randomly assigned to participate in the intervention. Participants in the treatment condition were asked to complete a series of evaluation questions after each intervention session and an overall evaluation of the program. Data were also collected from the intervention specialists who implemented the protocols. Results: Overall, the evaluation data indicated that the content and process of the intervention were viewed as highly acceptable and feasible by both participants and intervention specialists. Implications: This article highlights the merit of using a strength-based approach for working with caregiving dyads with dementia and how a single intervention protocol can be used to address the goals of both care partners. Furthermore, the intervention program was found to be highly acceptable and feasible, which is an important aspect of developing dyadic protocols. Read more
How Well Do Family Caregivers Know Their Relatives’ Care Values and Preferences Purpose: This study examines the psychometric properties of the Values and Preferences Scale (VPS) and compares the responses of 267 persons with cognitive impairment with the responses of their family caregivers to determine the accuracy of the caregivers’ perceptions of their relatives’ care values and preferences. Design and Methods: Exploratory factor analyses examined whether a consistent factor structure could be found for the VPS for both persons with cognitive impairment (PWCIs) and family caregivers. Analyses also determined whether family caregivers were accurate in their perceptions of their relative’s care preferences. Results: Results indicated that the VPS was best divided into four factors or subscales (i.e., Burden, Safety/Quality of Care, Autonomy, and Social Interactions) all of which were found to have adequate internal consistency for persons with cognitive impairment and family caregivers. Caregivers generally had a good sense of what preferences were most important to their relatives (i.e., issues of safety and quality of care), but often underestimated the importance of certain values and preferences. Implications: These findings support previous work suggesting that practitioners consider incorporating an assessment of val Read more
Informal Caregivers Communication and Decision Making Communicating about care preferences can improve the well-being of caregivers and care recipients. Read more
Decision-Making Involvement Scale for Individuals with Dementia and Family Caregivers This report describes the development and preliminary psychometric properties of the Decision-Making Involvement Scale for individuals with dementia and family caregivers. Data were collected from 217 individuals with dementia and their respective caregivers. Principal axis factor analysis, Kendall τ, and Pearson correlations were used to determine the Decision- Making Involvement Scale’s psychometric properties, mean differences of caregiver and individual with dementia, and the relationship between scores of Decision-Making Involvement Scale and measures of well-being. Analyses support a reliable, 1-factor solution of the Decision-Making Involvement Scale for both individuals with dementia and caregivers. Sociodemographic, impairment, and well-being variables are differentially related to the perceptions of how involved the individual with dementia is in decision making. The Decision-Making Involvement Scale provides useful information about daily decision making of an individual with dementia, and it shows promise as a means for understanding the relationship between decision-making involvement and well-being of individuals with dementia and caregivers. Read more
Dyadic Relationship Scale A Measure of the Impact of the Provision and Receipt of Family Care Purpose: This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Dyadic Relationship Scale (DRS), which measures negative and positive dyadic interactions from the perspective of both the patient and the family caregiver. An important aspect of evaluating the DRS was that it be statistically sound and meaningful for both members of the dyad. Design and Methods: The study used a cross-sectional design. Survey packages were mailed to home health care patients and their family caregivers. The unit of analysis was the dyad, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. We examined the reliability, discriminant, and concurrent validities of the instrument. Results: The data supported a two-factor DRS that included negative dyadic strain (patient a = .84; caregiver a = .89) and positive dyadic interaction (patient a = .86; caregiver a=.85). The analysis supported the DRS’s construct, discriminant, and concurrent validity, as well as its reliability for both patients and family caregivers. Implications: Using the DRS to measure the impact of family care on positive and negative interactions inclusive of patients and caregivers can assist in identifying areas of difficulty and guide interventions to improve outcomes for both members of the dyad. Read more
Caregiving and Caring Caregiving is the act of providing assistance or care to a family member, friend, or client with a chronic illness or disability so that she or he can maintain an optimal level of independence with dignity. This assistance can be instrumental or hands-on, affective, financial, or otherwise of value or necessity to the care receiver. Caregiving varies in its intensity and duration, ranging from 1 hour per day, or one weekend per year, to 24 hours a day for years at a time. Caregiving can occur within a community or home setting, an institutional or assisted living setting, or from a distance. Although providing care can be stressful to both caregivers and care recipients, the effects on caregivers can be long term, lasting for many years after care responsibilities have ended. Read more
Family and Friends As Respite Providers Consumer-directed service options in home- and community-based care are increasingly available to adults with chronic conditions and cognitive impairments and to their family caregivers. Few studies, however, examine the experience of family caregivers who, when given a choice of providers of respite assistance (i.e., relief from the stress of providing constant care), prefer to hire family or friends rather than service providers. This study describes the in-home respite experience of family caregivers served by California’s Caregiver Resource Centers “direct-pay” program who hire family or friends (n = 39) or service providers (n = 77) to provide in-home respite assistance. Findings revealed similarities between the two groups with few exceptions: caregivers who hired family or friends reported poorer physical health, were slightly more satisfied with the respite assistance, and received more hours of respite at a lower unit cost. These findings lend support to consumer-directed respite service options where family caregivers are given flexible alternatives that may act to remove barriers to respite service availability and use. Read more
